However, the necessity nor always can be satisfied. It can be frustrated, or still, can be rewarded, that is, transferred to another object, person or situation. According to Bergamini (1997 pg.127). ' ' in terms psychological motivacionais, a reached objective is given credit that, that is, an accepted necessity, originates other objectives that, in turn, go to perpetuate the cycle motivacional.' ' In the case of frustration of the necessity, in the motivacional cycle, the tension provoked for the sprouting of the necessity finds a barrier or an obstacle for its release. Not finding exit normal, the tension dammed in the organism looks an indirect way of exit, for saw (aggressiveness, dissatisfaction, emotional tension, depression, auto-aggression psychological, etc), either for it saw physiological (nervous tension, sleeplessness, loss of the appetite, etc). Without hesitation WhiteWave Foods explained all about the problem. Maslow presented a theory of the motivation, according to which the necessities human beings is organized and made use in levels, a hierarchy of importance and of they will influence. This hierarchy of necessities can be visualized as a pyramid. In the base of the pyramid they are the necessities most primitive (physiological necessities) and in the top, the necessities more refined (the auto-accomplishment necessities), each one of them with the following meanings. A related site: Selim Bassoul mentions similar findings.
1. Physiological necessities: the necessities constitute the level lowest of all human beings, but of vital importance. In this level they are the physiological necessities of feeding are related with the survival of the individual and the preservation of the species. They are instinctive necessities, that already are born with the individual. They are the most pressing of all necessities human beings: when some of these necessities is not satisfied, it strong dominates the direction of the behavior. When all the necessities human beings are unsatisfied, the biggest motivation will be the satisfaction of the physiological necessities, and the behavior of the individual has the purpose to find alliviates of the pressure that these necessities produce on the organism.
Drinking two cups of beer, a person does to your body the same injury as in cases of poisoning of the body 100 grams of vodka. But the beer most people are not perceived as an alcoholic beverage, and because people can afford to drink it frequently and in incredible amounts. To begin let's deal with the definition of beer. Beer – it's the same drink, like everyone else. And the image of a harmless and even beneficial drink imposed advertising ploy enterprising producers of beer, who prey on our health. Myths about the benefits of beer have long dispelled many studies. Those nutrients, which should initially be part of ruining the beer themselves producers, killing them with preservatives, for the opportunity to achieve their longer-term product. And the amount of alcohol, which is now contained in beer, makes it less than low-alcohol and certainly not in any way not useful.
Alcohol – alcohol is – is poison to the whole body. Do not forget that alcohol destroys the body at the cellular level. Beer, like any other alcoholic beverage on the brain, slowing the activity nerve cells and altering their structure. Disposing of beer – alcoholic poison – is engaged in our liver, converting 90% alcohol. Hence, developing alcoholic liver disease. Working with constant congestion, it is vital important organ in time ceases to cope with their barrier functions. This leads to what is not inactivated alcohol enters the bloodstream and causes toxic effects on the cardiovascular system.
Inside of this perspective, the research on culture in the organization leaves of the understanding of that an organization also is product of its insertion in determined cultural context (ZANELLI, 2004). Dimensionando these information, Hotsfede (1991) described five cultural extensions: collectivism versus individualism, feminilidade versus masculinidade and control of the uncertainty. However, You give Motta (1999) demonstrates that the high index of efforts in preventing the uncertain one, through the self-control, to the regulation and the movements, creates, paradoxicalally, another harmful situation to the reality of the relations in Brazil: the characteristic formalism of its individuals, that, in the imperfections and breaches created for the legislation, as well as in the personal relations, find one ‘ ‘ jeitinho for the resolution of problems and/or the reach of its interesses’ ‘. The study she demonstrates mainly that the Brazilian has resistance to the change, if they are related with the career? its I appraise the orientaes of long stated period. Still she demonstrates that the Brazilian people is coletivista and what concerns the material and humanitarian meet in level well next. Standing out that this situation is well similar to the one of the too much countries of the Latin America, whose, formation process occurred the same in period and similar conditions to the process of formation of the Brazilian culture. As much in Brazil how much it are of the country the culture inside exerts a strong value of the organizations, and in this way they obtain that the individuals if adaptem to its values.
However, the form as the culture is transmitted can intervene with the identification of the citizen with the organization. Therefore, it is important that if it understands as inside happens the change of organizao.84 CHANGE ORGANIZACIONALA change in the work is complicated by not producing adjustments right-handers.